interactive-planner
About
The interactive-planner skill uses Claude Code's AskUserQuestion tool to systematically gather project requirements through structured multi-select questions. It helps developers break complex projects into scopable decisions and convert vague ideas into concrete specifications. Use this skill when you need comprehensive requirement gathering through interactive, multi-dimensional analysis.
Documentation
Interactive Planner
Purpose
Leverage Claude Code's AskUserQuestion tool to systematically gather project requirements through structured, interactive questions with multiple choice and multi-select options.
Specialist Agent
I am a requirements gathering specialist with expertise in:
- Structured question design for maximum clarity
- Breaking complex projects into scopable decisions
- Multi-dimensional requirement analysis
- Balancing detail with user experience
- Converting vague ideas into concrete specifications
Methodology (Plan-and-Solve Pattern)
- Parse Request: Understand the high-level goal and domain
- Design Question Strategy: Plan 4-question batches for comprehensive coverage
- Generate Questions: Create clear, non-overlapping questions with 2-4 options each
- Collect Responses: Use AskUserQuestion tool for interactive gathering
- Synthesize Specification: Convert answers into actionable requirements
Question Design Principles
Effective Questions:
- ✅ Clear, specific, single-dimensional
- ✅ 2-4 mutually exclusive options (unless multiSelect)
- ✅ Each option has helpful description
- ✅ Cover different aspects (no overlap)
- ✅ Short headers (max 12 chars) for UI
- ✅ Enable multiSelect when choices aren't exclusive
Poor Questions:
- ❌ Vague or ambiguous wording
- ❌ Too many options (>4)
- ❌ Options overlap in meaning
- ❌ Missing descriptions
- ❌ Multiple concerns in one question
Question Categories
Category 1: Core Functionality
- What is the primary purpose?
- What are the key features?
- What user actions are supported?
- What data is being managed?
Category 2: Technical Architecture
- What tech stack/framework?
- What database/storage?
- What authentication method?
- What deployment target?
Category 3: User Experience
- Who are the users?
- What's the interaction model?
- What's the visual style?
- What accessibility level?
Category 4: Quality & Scale
- What performance requirements?
- What testing coverage?
- What documentation level?
- What scalability needs?
Category 5: Constraints & Context
- What existing systems integrate?
- What timeline/deadlines?
- What budget/resource limits?
- What compliance requirements?
Interactive Planning Workflow
Phase 1: Initial Exploration (4 questions)
Question 1: Project Type
- Web application
- Mobile application
- API/Backend service
- Library/Package
Question 2: Primary Goal
- New feature
- Refactoring
- Bug fix
- Performance optimization
Question 3: Complexity
- Simple (1-2 files)
- Moderate (3-10 files)
- Complex (10+ files)
- Large-scale (architecture change)
Question 4: Timeline
- Urgent (today)
- This week
- This month
- Flexible
Phase 2: Technical Details (4 questions)
Question 1: Framework
- React/Next.js
- Vue/Nuxt
- Angular
- Vanilla JS/Custom
Question 2: Backend (multiSelect enabled)
- REST API
- GraphQL
- WebSockets
- Database direct
Question 3: Testing (multiSelect enabled)
- Unit tests
- Integration tests
- E2E tests
- None needed
Question 4: Deployment
- Vercel/Netlify
- AWS/GCP/Azure
- Docker/Kubernetes
- Self-hosted
Phase 3: Requirements Refinement (4 questions)
Question 1: Authentication
- OAuth2 (Google, GitHub)
- Email/Password
- Magic links
- None needed
Question 2: Data Storage
- PostgreSQL
- MongoDB
- Firebase
- Local/None
Question 3: Features Needed (multiSelect enabled)
- User management
- Real-time updates
- File uploads
- Search/filtering
Question 4: Quality Level
- Quick prototype
- Production MVP
- Enterprise grade
- Research/experimental
Working with Tool Limitations
AskUserQuestion Tool Constraints:
- Maximum 4 questions per call
- 2-4 options per question
- "Other" option automatically added
- Headers limited to 12 characters
- multiSelect available for non-exclusive choices
Multi-Batch Strategy (20-30 questions total):
Batch 1 (4 questions): High-level project scope
Batch 2 (4 questions): Technical architecture
Batch 3 (4 questions): Feature prioritization
Batch 4 (4 questions): Quality/testing requirements
Batch 5 (4 questions): Integration/deployment
[Continue until comprehensive coverage]
When NOT to Use Interactive Questions:
- User has already provided detailed spec
- Exploratory/research phase (needs open discussion)
- Single, simple change requested
- Follow-up questions on existing work
When to Use Open Questions Instead:
For new complex projects:
"Before using interactive questions, let me ask 20-30 clarifying questions
to fully understand your requirements. Please answer each one thoroughly."
[Ask detailed questions in conversation]
[Then summarize into structured specification]
Example Question Sets
For Landing Page Translation:
questions:
- question: "Which languages should we support?"
header: "Languages"
multiSelect: true
options:
- label: "Japanese"
description: "Full Japanese localization"
- label: "Spanish"
description: "Spanish (Spain & Latin America)"
- label: "French"
description: "French localization"
- label: "German"
description: "German localization"
- question: "What translation approach should we use?"
header: "Approach"
multiSelect: false
options:
- label: "i18n library"
description: "Use react-i18n or next-intl"
- label: "JSON files"
description: "Simple key-value JSON files"
- label: "Database"
description: "Store translations in database"
- question: "Which content should be translated?"
header: "Content"
multiSelect: true
options:
- label: "UI text"
description: "Buttons, labels, navigation"
- label: "Marketing"
description: "Headlines, descriptions, CTAs"
- label: "Metadata"
description: "SEO titles, descriptions, og tags"
- label: "Error messages"
description: "Validation and error text"
- question: "How should language be selected?"
header: "Selection"
multiSelect: false
options:
- label: "Auto-detect"
description: "Use browser language preference"
- label: "Dropdown"
description: "User selects from menu"
- label: "URL-based"
description: "/en/, /ja/, etc."
- label: "Subdomain"
description: "ja.site.com, en.site.com"
For OAuth Implementation:
questions:
- question: "Which OAuth providers should we support?"
header: "Providers"
multiSelect: true
options:
- label: "Google"
description: "Google OAuth 2.0"
- label: "GitHub"
description: "GitHub OAuth"
- label: "Microsoft"
description: "Microsoft/Azure AD"
- label: "Facebook"
description: "Facebook Login"
- question: "What OAuth library should we use?"
header: "Library"
multiSelect: false
options:
- label: "NextAuth.js"
description: "Full-featured, Next.js optimized"
- label: "Passport.js"
description: "Flexible, many strategies"
- label: "Auth0"
description: "Managed service"
- label: "Custom"
description: "Build from OAuth2 spec"
- question: "What user data should we request?"
header: "Scopes"
multiSelect: true
options:
- label: "Basic profile"
description: "Name, email, avatar"
- label: "Email verified"
description: "Verified email address"
- label: "Extended profile"
description: "Location, bio, etc."
- label: "API access"
description: "Access user's provider data"
- question: "How should we handle sessions?"
header: "Sessions"
multiSelect: false
options:
- label: "JWT tokens"
description: "Stateless JWT tokens"
- label: "Database sessions"
description: "Server-side session storage"
- label: "Cookies"
description: "Encrypted cookie sessions"
- label: "Redis"
description: "Redis-backed sessions"
Input Contract
project_description: string
project_type: web | mobile | api | library | cli | other
complexity_estimate: simple | moderate | complex
has_existing_spec: boolean
planning_depth: shallow | normal | deep
Output Contract
gathered_requirements:
project_scope: object
technical_decisions: object
feature_list: array[string]
constraints: array[string]
quality_requirements: object
specification_document: markdown
question_batches_used: number
confidence_level: high | medium | low
missing_information: array[string] (what still needs clarification)
Integration Points
- Cascades: First step in feature development workflows
- Commands:
/plan-interactive,/scope-project - Other Skills: Works with web-cli-teleport, sparc-methodology, feature-dev-complete
Usage Examples
New Project Planning:
Use interactive-planner to scope out a new e-commerce checkout flow with payment integration
Feature Addition:
I want to add real-time collaboration to my app. Use interactive questions to understand requirements.
Comprehensive Scoping:
Use interactive-planner with deep planning for a complete rewrite of the authentication system.
Ask 20-30 questions across multiple batches to ensure we cover everything.
Best Practices
Question Design:
- Start broad, get specific in later batches
- Use multiSelect when user might want multiple options
- Keep options truly distinct (no overlap)
- Provide helpful context in descriptions
- Keep headers under 12 characters for UI
Multi-Batch Planning:
- Batch 1: Project type, goal, complexity
- Batch 2: Tech stack, architecture
- Batch 3: Core features, priorities
- Batch 4: Quality, testing, docs
- Batch 5+: Domain-specific details
Synthesis:
- Summarize all answers clearly
- Identify conflicts or gaps
- Ask follow-up questions if needed
- Create actionable specification
- Confirm understanding before proceeding
Failure Modes & Mitigations
- Too few questions: Use multiple batches, aim for 20-30 total
- Questions overlap: Design orthogonal question dimensions
- User picks "Other" repeatedly: Questions too restrictive, use open discussion
- Vague answers: Ask for clarification before proceeding
- Missing critical info: Always ask about constraints, integrations, timeline
Validation Checklist
- Questions cover all critical dimensions
- No overlapping options within questions
- Headers are under 12 characters
- Descriptions provide helpful context
- multiSelect enabled where appropriate
- Specification document is complete
- No critical gaps in requirements
- User confirmed understanding
Neural Training Integration
training:
pattern: convergent
feedback_collection: true
success_metrics:
- questions_needed_for_completeness
- user_satisfaction_with_process
- specification_clarity
- downstream_rework_rate
Quick Reference:
- Max 4 questions per batch
- Use multiSelect for non-exclusive choices
- "Other" option always available
- Plan 5-8 batches for complex projects
Pro Tips:
- Better to ask more questions upfront than iterate later
- Use in Planning Mode for automatic activation
- Combine with open discussion for best results
- Save complex projects for CLI, simple tasks for Web
Quick Install
/plugin add https://github.com/DNYoussef/ai-chrome-extension/tree/main/interactive-plannerCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
GitHub 仓库
Related Skills
requesting-code-review
DesignThis skill dispatches a code-reviewer subagent to analyze code changes against requirements before proceeding. It should be used after completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to main. The review helps catch issues early by comparing the current implementation with the original plan.
receiving-code-review
DesignThis skill helps developers process code review feedback by emphasizing technical verification over immediate agreement. It provides a structured workflow for understanding, evaluating, and responding to suggestions, especially when feedback is unclear or technically questionable. The core principle is to ensure technical correctness through rigorous analysis before implementing any changes.
executing-plans
DesignUse the executing-plans skill when you have a complete implementation plan to execute in controlled batches with review checkpoints. It loads and critically reviews the plan, then executes tasks in small batches (default 3 tasks) while reporting progress between each batch for architect review. This ensures systematic implementation with built-in quality control checkpoints.
web-cli-teleport
DesignThis skill helps developers choose between Claude Code Web and CLI interfaces based on task complexity and workflow needs. It enables seamless teleportation of sessions between environments to maintain context and optimize productivity. Use it for session management and to determine the best interface for coding tasks requiring different levels of iteration or back-and-forth interaction.
