SKILL·32AE3D

memex-wrap

pjt222
Updated Yesterday
21
3
21
View on GitHub
Documentationai

About

The `memex-wrap` skill automates the handoff process after completing a milestone slice in a memex repository. It updates key documentation (`CONTINUE_HERE.md` and `ROADMAP.md`) to reflect the current state and next steps, and proposes the appropriate git tag and commit message. Use it before committing to ensure the project's trail and scoreboard are synchronized with the shipped work.

Quick Install

Claude Code

Recommended
Primary
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Plugin CommandAlternative
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternative
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/memex-wrap

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

Documentation

Wrap a Memex Milestone Slice

Close the loop on a finished slice. A slice ships code; the wrap ships the trail that lets the next session resume without re-deriving where things stand. Two docs carry that trail — docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md (where we are, what's next) and docs/ROADMAP.md (the milestone scoreboard) — and the wrap leaves both consistent with what actually landed. It does not log observations or run the verification gates itself; it confirms the first was done (deferring to memex-observe) and hands off to the second (memex-verify).

When to Use

  • You just finished a milestone slice in the memex repo (a - [x]-sized unit of work) and are about to commit and tag it.
  • You are handing the next slice to a fresh session and need CONTINUE_HERE.md to point at the right starting line.
  • CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 or ROADMAP.md's scoreboard has drifted behind what actually shipped, and you want to reconcile them before moving on.
<!-- These triggers also appear in the description so discovery sees them before the body loads. -->

Inputs

  • Required: The memex repo checked out, with cwd = repo root (a checkout of github.com/pjt222/memex). All paths below are repo-relative.
  • Required: A finished slice — code committed or staged, slice known by its milestone + slice letter/number (e.g. "M5 Slice A").
  • Required: docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md and docs/ROADMAP.md present and writable.
  • Optional: $MEMEX_STORE_PATH / $MEMEX_PG_URL — only needed if Step 3 ends up logging a new observation, and even then the logging itself is delegated to memex-observe, which owns those prerequisites.

This skill edits docs and proposes git commands. It does not push, tag, or run the test gate — those belong to commit-changes and memex-verify.

Procedure

Step 1: Update docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 (current state) and §3 (next slice)

Read the file first; both sections are prose with a specific shape you must match, not free-form.

# Orient: the "Last updated" line, §1 Current state, §3 Next milestone
sed -n '1,40p' docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md
awk '/^## 1\./,/^## 2\./' docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md
awk '/^## 3\./,/^## 3a\./' docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md

Then edit (use the Edit tool — keep surrounding prose intact):

  • Last updated: line near the top — set today's date and a one-line summary of the slice (mirror the existing format: date — what landed + the commit short-SHAs + branch + state).
  • §1 Current state — move the finished slice from "in progress / next" into Shipped, following the existing M_ ... (shortsha, tag vX.Y.Z) cadence. If the slice opened new tech-debt or deferrals, note them where the section already tracks those.
  • §3 Next milestone — if this slice completed a milestone, advance §3 to the next milestone (copy the goal / required-pieces / tasks-in-order / definition-of-done shape from ROADMAP.md). If the milestone has more slices left, narrow §3's "tasks in order" to the next slice so the fresh session starts on the right line.

Expected: §1 names the just-shipped slice under Shipped with its SHA(s) and (if a milestone closed) tag; §3 describes the next concrete slice. The Last updated: line reflects today.

On failure: If the section headers don't match (## 1. / ## 3.), the doc has been restructured — re-read it top-to-bottom and adapt to its current headings rather than forcing the old shape. Never fabricate a SHA; if the commit doesn't exist yet, write (<commit pending>) and fill it after Step 4.

Step 2: Tick the docs/ROADMAP.md scoreboard

The scoreboard encodes completion two ways: a milestone header gains a ✅ (vX.Y.Z) suffix when the milestone is done, and each finished line item flips - [ ] to - [x]. Read the relevant block first.

# Find the milestone block you're closing items in
awk '/^## M5/,/^## M6/' docs/ROADMAP.md

Then, with the Edit tool:

  • Check the items you shipped: turn each finished - [ ] into - [x]. Leave genuinely-incomplete or deferred items as - [ ] (a deferred item often carries a — deferred to MX.Y note; preserve it).
  • Mark the header only when the whole milestone is done — append ✅ (vX.Y.Z) to the ## MN — ... header, matching shipped milestones above it (e.g. ## M4 — MCP ✅ (v0.4.0)). A milestone with any unchecked, non-deferred item is not done — do not flag its header.

Expected: Every item the slice completed reads - [x]; the header shows ✅ (vX.Y.Z) if and only if all of its non-deferred items are checked. The new version matches the tag you propose in Step 4.

On failure: If you're unsure whether an item is truly done versus partially done, leave it - [ ] and note the partial state in CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 instead — an over-optimistic scoreboard is the exact drift this skill exists to prevent. Match the existing checkbox/version formatting; don't invent a new style.

Step 3: Confirm any new observation is logged (defer to memex-observe)

A slice that surfaced a bias, a near-miss, or a reusable lesson should have a matching observation in the bias-log. The wrap's job is to confirm that — not to author the entry or restate the logging CLI.

# Quick existence check: does the bias-log already hold this slice's lesson?
sed -n '1,40p' docs/OBSERVATIONS.md

Decide:

  • Nothing worth logging? Note that explicitly in CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 ("no new observations this slice") so the next session knows it was considered, not skipped, and move on.
  • A lesson is worth logging? Stop and run the memex-observe skill to add it. That skill owns the memex add --type observation ... command shape (body piped via stdin, --title required) and the prerequisites. Do not restate or inline that command here — invoke the skill.

The observation body shape lives in docs/OBSERVATIONS.md (the authoritative "Two paths to add an observation" block is lines 10–21). The current form (example, current as of v0.4.0; parsed by crates/memex-extract/src/meditate_vipassana.rs) is:

N. **Title.** Body sentence(s). Mitigation: <what to do next time>. Origin: <date> + <context>.

Treat docs/OBSERVATIONS.md lines 10–21 as the source of truth for this shape — if it has moved on from the v0.4.0 form, follow the file, not this example.

Expected: Either a recorded decision that there's nothing to log (noted in §1), or a new observation added via memex-observe with the next entry number.

On failure: If you can't tell whether a lesson is observation-worthy, err toward logging it — a redundant observation costs little; a lost one costs a re-derivation next session.

Step 4: Propose the git tag and the commit subject

Don't commit or tag here — propose both so the operator (or the commit-changes skill) can execute them. Use the memex commit convention: subject = MN Slice X: <summary>.

# Surface what's staged/unstaged so the proposed subject matches reality
git -C . status --short
git -C . diff --stat

Propose:

  • Commit subjectMN Slice X: <imperative summary> (e.g. M5 Slice A: per-file project helper + watcher skeleton). Keep the subject tight; put the why and the doc-trail updates in the body.
  • Tag — only when this slice closes a milestone. Propose the next semver tag matching the ✅ (vX.Y.Z) you set in Step 2 (e.g. v0.5.0 for M5). A mid-milestone slice gets a commit but no tag — say so explicitly rather than proposing a tag.

Present both as a ready-to-run block for the operator to confirm:

Proposed commit subject: M5 Slice A: per-file project helper + watcher skeleton
Proposed tag:           (none — mid-milestone slice; tag at M5 close as v0.5.0)

Expected: A clearly-labeled proposal: one commit subject in MN Slice X: form, and either a concrete vX.Y.Z tag (milestone close) or an explicit "no tag this slice" note. Nothing is committed or tagged by this skill.

On failure: If the milestone number / slice letter is ambiguous, read ROADMAP.md and CONTINUE_HERE.md §3 to fix the MN and X; never guess a version — derive it from the scoreboard you just ticked in Step 2.

Validation

  • CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 lists the just-shipped slice under Shipped with its commit SHA(s), and Last updated: reflects today
  • CONTINUE_HERE.md §3 points at the next concrete slice (advanced to the next milestone if this slice closed one)
  • Every ROADMAP.md item the slice completed is now - [x]; deferred items remain - [ ] with their deferral notes intact
  • The ROADMAP.md milestone header carries ✅ (vX.Y.Z) iff all its non-deferred items are checked
  • A new observation was added via memex-observe, or §1 explicitly records that none was needed
  • A commit subject in MN Slice X: form is proposed, plus a concrete tag (milestone close) or an explicit "no tag" note — nothing committed or tagged by this skill

Common Pitfalls

  • Flagging a milestone header done while an item is still open. The on the header is an all-items claim. Tick items in Step 2 first, then check the header only if nothing non-deferred remains.
  • Restating the observation CLI here. Step 3 confirms logging happened; it delegates the actual memex add to memex-observe. Inlining the command duplicates a surface that drifts — reference the skill instead.
  • Running memex init. That is the CLI store/db setup command, not part of any wrap or session ritual. Wrapping a slice never calls memex init.
  • Inventing a SHA or version. Derive the tag from the scoreboard you just ticked; derive the SHA from git log after the commit exists. Use a (pending) placeholder rather than a fabricated value.
  • Committing or tagging from this skill. The wrap proposes; execution is commit-changes' job, and the test/format gate is memex-verify's. Keep the boundary — don't let the heaviest skill absorb its neighbors.
  • Hard-asserting a test count as a pass gate. That belongs to memex-verify, and even there the gate is exit 0 / "test result: ok" — counts (e.g. "~60 at v0.4.0") are informational and grow per milestone.
  • Forcing the old doc shape after a restructure. If ## 1. / ## 3. or the scoreboard headings have changed, adapt to the file as it is now; the doc-reading order itself is owned by adapters/session-init.txt.

Related Skills

  • memex-init — the session-start counterpart: loads the trail this skill writes. Wrap closes the loop that init opens.
  • memex-observe — owns logging a bias-log observation; Step 3 defers to it rather than restating its CLI.
  • memex-verify — runs the test/format/build gate; the wrap proposes the commit, verify confirms the slice is green before it lands.
  • write-continue-here — the general-purpose continuation-file skill; this skill is its memex-specific specialization for §1/§3 and the scoreboard.
  • commit-changes — executes the commit subject and tag that Step 4 proposes.

GitHub Repository

pjt222/agent-almanac
Path: i18n/ja/skills/memex-wrap
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the memex-wrap skill?

memex-wrap is a Claude Skill by pjt222. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform memex-wrap-related tasks without extra prompting.

How do I install memex-wrap?

Use the install commands on this page: add memex-wrap to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.

What category does memex-wrap belong to?

memex-wrap is in the Documentation category, tagged ai.

Is memex-wrap free to use?

Yes. memex-wrap is listed on AIMCP and free to install. It runs inside Claude, so no separate service account is required to use the skill itself.

Related Skills

railway-docs
Documentation

This skill fetches current Railway documentation to answer questions about features, functionality, or specific docs URLs. It ensures developers receive accurate, up-to-date information directly from Railway's official sources. Use it when users ask how Railway works or reference Railway documentation.

View skill
n8n-code-python
Documentation

This Claude Skill provides expert guidance for writing Python code in n8n's Code nodes, specifically for using Python's standard library and working with n8n's special syntax like `_input`, `_json`, and `_node`. It helps developers understand Python's limitations within n8n and recommends using JavaScript for most workflows while offering Python solutions for specific data transformation needs.

View skill
archon
Documentation

The Archon skill provides RAG-powered semantic search and project management through a REST API. Use it for querying documentation, managing hierarchical projects/tasks, and performing knowledge retrieval with document upload capabilities. Always prioritize Archon first when searching external documentation before using other sources.

View skill
n8n-code-javascript
Documentation

This Claude Skill provides expert guidance for writing JavaScript code in n8n's Code nodes. It covers essential n8n-specific syntax like `$input`/`$json` variables, HTTP helpers, and DateTime handling, while troubleshooting common errors. Use it when developing n8n workflows that require custom JavaScript processing in Code nodes.

View skill