Back to Skills

consultancy-practices

proffesor-for-testing
Updated Today
101 views
99
21
99
View on GitHub
Otherconsultingadvisoryclient-engagementquality-assessmenttransformation

About

This skill applies proven software quality consultancy practices for advising clients or establishing consultancy workflows. It provides structured approaches for assessment, transformation, and advisory engagements, emphasizing listening, prioritization, and knowledge transfer. Key features include quick reference guidance and integration with quality analysis agents.

Quick Install

Claude Code

Recommended
Plugin CommandRecommended
/plugin add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Git CloneAlternative
git clone https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe.git ~/.claude/skills/consultancy-practices

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

Documentation

Consultancy Practices

<default_to_action> When consulting on quality:

  1. LISTEN FIRST: Understand their context before prescribing solutions
  2. DISCOVER: What's the pain? What have they tried? What are constraints?
  3. PRIORITIZE: Impact/effort matrix - high impact, low effort first
  4. TRANSFER KNOWLEDGE: Leave them better, not dependent on you
  5. MEASURE: Define success metrics upfront, track weekly

Engagement Types:

  • Assessment (1-4 weeks): Discover, analyze, recommend
  • Transformation (3-12 months): Implement new practices
  • Advisory (ongoing): Strategic guidance, course-correct
  • Crisis (1-4 weeks): Fix critical issues blocking production

Key Questions:

  • "Walk me through your last deployment"
  • "Tell me about a recent bug that escaped to production"
  • "If you could fix one thing, what would it be?" </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

The Consulting Process

PhaseDurationGoalDeliverable
DiscoveryWeek 1-2Understand contextInterview notes, observations
AnalysisWeek 2-3Identify root causesImpact/effort matrix
RecommendationsWeek 3-4Present findingsReport with roadmap
ImplementationMonth 2-6+Execute changesWorking system, trained team
TransitionFinal monthEnsure self-sufficiencyHandover docs

Impact/Effort Matrix

PriorityWhatAction
High Impact, Low EffortQuick winsDo first
High Impact, High EffortMajor initiativesPlan carefully
Low Impact, Low EffortNice-to-havesIf time permits
Low Impact, High EffortDistractionsSkip

Common Patterns

"We Need Test Automation"

What they say: "We need test automation" What they mean: "Manual testing is too slow/expensive"

Discovery: How long is regression? What's deployment frequency?

Typical Finding: They need faster feedback, not "automation"

Recommendation:

  1. Unit tests for new code (TDD)
  2. Smoke tests for critical paths
  3. Keep exploratory for discovery
  4. Build automation incrementally

"Fix Our Quality Problem"

What they say: "We have too many bugs" What they mean: "Something is broken but we don't know what"

Discovery: Where found? What types? When introduced?

Typical Finding: No test strategy, testing too late, poor feedback loops

Recommendation:

  1. Shift testing left
  2. Improve coverage on critical paths
  3. Speed up CI/CD feedback
  4. Better requirements/acceptance criteria

"We Want to Scale Quality"

What they say: "Growing fast, quality can't keep up" What they mean: "Can't hire enough QA fast enough"

Discovery: Current QA:Dev ratio? Where's QA spending time?

Typical Finding: QA is bottleneck - manual regression, gatekeeping

Recommendation:

  1. Make QA strategic, not tactical
  2. Developers own test automation
  3. QA focuses on exploratory, risk analysis
  4. Use agentic approaches for scale

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternProblemBetter
Cookie-CutterSame solution everywhereContext-specific recommendations
Tool PusherRecommend expensive toolsTools that solve actual problems
Process NaziImpose rigid processLightweight, fits their culture
Permanent FixtureNever leave, create dependencyWork toward them not needing you
Blame GamePoint fingers at peopleFix systems, not blame people

Difficult Situations

"We already tried that" → "Tell me what you tried and what didn't work" (learn from their experience)

"Our context is special" → "Help me understand what makes yours special" (they might be right, or making excuses)

"We don't have budget/time" → "What's the cost of not fixing this? Let's start small" (show ROI)

"That won't work here" → "What specific constraints? Let's adapt" (find what WILL work)


Agent Integration

// Automated codebase assessment
const assessment = await Task("Assess Codebase", {
  scope: 'client-project/',
  depth: 'comprehensive',
  reportFormat: 'executive-summary'
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");

// Returns: { qualityScore, testCoverage, technicalDebt, recommendations }

// ROI analysis for quality initiatives
const roi = await Task("Calculate ROI", {
  currentState: { defectEscapeRate: 0.15, mttr: 48 },
  proposedImprovements: ['test-automation', 'ci-cd-pipeline'],
  timeframe: '6-months'
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");

// Returns: { estimatedCost, estimatedSavings, paybackPeriod }

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/consultancy/
├── assessments/*      - Client assessments
├── recommendations/*  - Prioritized recommendations
├── roi-analysis/*     - ROI calculations
└── progress/*         - Implementation tracking

Fleet Coordination

const consultingFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'client-engagement',
  agents: [
    'qe-quality-analyzer',          // Assess current state
    'qe-regression-risk-analyzer',  // Risk assessment
    'qe-quality-gate',              // Define quality gates
    'qe-deployment-readiness'       // Deployment maturity
  ],
  topology: 'hierarchical'
});

Related Skills


Remember

Good consulting is about empowering teams, not creating dependency. Your success is measured by them not needing you anymore - while still wanting to work with you again.

Best compliment: "We've got this now, but when we tackle X next year, we're calling you."

Be honest. Be helpful. Be context-driven. Leave them better.

GitHub Repository

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Path: .claude/skills/consultancy-practices
agenticqeagenticsfoundationagentsquality-engineering

Related Skills

consultancy-practices

Other

This skill provides structured practices for software quality consulting, helping developers advise clients or establish consultancy workflows. It emphasizes listening-first approaches, impact/effort prioritization, and knowledge transfer. Key features include engagement type guidance and success metric tracking for quality assessments.

View skill

content-collections

Meta

This skill provides a production-tested setup for Content Collections, a TypeScript-first tool that transforms Markdown/MDX files into type-safe data collections with Zod validation. Use it when building blogs, documentation sites, or content-heavy Vite + React applications to ensure type safety and automatic content validation. It covers everything from Vite plugin configuration and MDX compilation to deployment optimization and schema validation.

View skill

creating-opencode-plugins

Meta

This skill provides the structure and API specifications for creating OpenCode plugins that hook into 25+ event types like commands, files, and LSP operations. It offers implementation patterns for JavaScript/TypeScript modules that intercept and extend the AI assistant's lifecycle. Use it when you need to build event-driven plugins for monitoring, custom handling, or extending OpenCode's capabilities.

View skill

sglang

Meta

SGLang is a high-performance LLM serving framework that specializes in fast, structured generation for JSON, regex, and agentic workflows using its RadixAttention prefix caching. It delivers significantly faster inference, especially for tasks with repeated prefixes, making it ideal for complex, structured outputs and multi-turn conversations. Choose SGLang over alternatives like vLLM when you need constrained decoding or are building applications with extensive prefix sharing.

View skill