github-code-review
About
This skill automates comprehensive GitHub code reviews using AI-powered swarm coordination, enabling multi-agent analysis of pull requests. It performs security and performance analysis while orchestrating specialized review agents to generate intelligent comments. Use it when you need automated PR management with quality gate enforcement beyond traditional static analysis.
Documentation
GitHub Code Review Skill
AI-Powered Code Review: Deploy specialized review agents to perform comprehensive, intelligent code reviews that go beyond traditional static analysis.
π― Quick Start
Simple Review
# Initialize review swarm for PR
gh pr view 123 --json files,diff | npx ruv-swarm github review-init --pr 123
# Post review status
gh pr comment 123 --body "π Multi-agent code review initiated"
Complete Review Workflow
# Get PR context with gh CLI
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view 123 --json files,additions,deletions,title,body)
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123)
# Initialize comprehensive review
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 123 \
--pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
--diff "$PR_DIFF" \
--agents "security,performance,style,architecture,accessibility" \
--depth comprehensive
π Table of Contents
<details> <summary><strong>Core Features</strong></summary>- Multi-Agent Review System
- Specialized Review Agents
- PR-Based Swarm Management
- Automated Workflows
- Quality Gates & Checks
- Security Review Agent
- Performance Review Agent
- Architecture Review Agent
- Style & Convention Agent
- Accessibility Agent
π Core Features
Multi-Agent Review System
Deploy specialized AI agents for comprehensive code review:
# Initialize review swarm with GitHub CLI integration
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view 123 --json files,additions,deletions,title,body)
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123)
# Start multi-agent review
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 123 \
--pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
--diff "$PR_DIFF" \
--agents "security,performance,style,architecture,accessibility" \
--depth comprehensive
# Post initial review status
gh pr comment 123 --body "π Multi-agent code review initiated"
Benefits:
- β Parallel review by specialized agents
- β Comprehensive coverage across multiple domains
- β Faster review cycles with coordinated analysis
- β Consistent quality standards enforcement
π€ Specialized Review Agents
Security Review Agent
Focus: Identify security vulnerabilities and suggest fixes
# Get changed files from PR
CHANGED_FILES=$(gh pr view 123 --json files --jq '.files[].path')
# Run security-focused review
SECURITY_RESULTS=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-security \
--pr 123 \
--files "$CHANGED_FILES" \
--check "owasp,cve,secrets,permissions" \
--suggest-fixes)
# Post findings based on severity
if echo "$SECURITY_RESULTS" | grep -q "critical"; then
# Request changes for critical issues
gh pr review 123 --request-changes --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
gh pr edit 123 --add-label "security-review-required"
else
# Post as comment for non-critical issues
gh pr comment 123 --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
fi
<details>
<summary><strong>Security Checks Performed</strong></summary>
{
"checks": [
"SQL injection vulnerabilities",
"XSS attack vectors",
"Authentication bypasses",
"Authorization flaws",
"Cryptographic weaknesses",
"Dependency vulnerabilities",
"Secret exposure",
"CORS misconfigurations"
],
"actions": [
"Block PR on critical issues",
"Suggest secure alternatives",
"Add security test cases",
"Update security documentation"
]
}
</details>
<details>
<summary><strong>Comment Template: Security Issue</strong></summary>
π **Security Issue: [Type]**
**Severity**: π΄ Critical / π‘ High / π’ Low
**Description**:
[Clear explanation of the security issue]
**Impact**:
[Potential consequences if not addressed]
**Suggested Fix**:
```language
[Code example of the fix]
References:
</details>
---
### Performance Review Agent
**Focus:** Analyze performance impact and optimization opportunities
```bash
# Run performance analysis
npx ruv-swarm github review-performance \
--pr 123 \
--profile "cpu,memory,io" \
--benchmark-against main \
--suggest-optimizations
<details>
<summary><strong>Performance Metrics Analyzed</strong></summary>
{
"metrics": [
"Algorithm complexity (Big O analysis)",
"Database query efficiency",
"Memory allocation patterns",
"Cache utilization",
"Network request optimization",
"Bundle size impact",
"Render performance"
],
"benchmarks": [
"Compare with baseline",
"Load test simulations",
"Memory leak detection",
"Bottleneck identification"
]
}
</details>
Architecture Review Agent
Focus: Evaluate design patterns and architectural decisions
# Architecture review
npx ruv-swarm github review-architecture \
--pr 123 \
--check "patterns,coupling,cohesion,solid" \
--visualize-impact \
--suggest-refactoring
<details>
<summary><strong>Architecture Analysis</strong></summary>
{
"patterns": [
"Design pattern adherence",
"SOLID principles",
"DRY violations",
"Separation of concerns",
"Dependency injection",
"Layer violations",
"Circular dependencies"
],
"metrics": [
"Coupling metrics",
"Cohesion scores",
"Complexity measures",
"Maintainability index"
]
}
</details>
Style & Convention Agent
Focus: Enforce coding standards and best practices
# Style enforcement with auto-fix
npx ruv-swarm github review-style \
--pr 123 \
--check "formatting,naming,docs,tests" \
--auto-fix "formatting,imports,whitespace"
<details>
<summary><strong>Style Checks</strong></summary>
{
"checks": [
"Code formatting",
"Naming conventions",
"Documentation standards",
"Comment quality",
"Test coverage",
"Error handling patterns",
"Logging standards"
],
"auto-fix": [
"Formatting issues",
"Import organization",
"Trailing whitespace",
"Simple naming issues"
]
}
</details>
π PR-Based Swarm Management
Create Swarm from PR
# Create swarm from PR description using gh CLI
gh pr view 123 --json body,title,labels,files | npx ruv-swarm swarm create-from-pr
# Auto-spawn agents based on PR labels
gh pr view 123 --json labels | npx ruv-swarm swarm auto-spawn
# Create swarm with full PR context
gh pr view 123 --json body,labels,author,assignees | \
npx ruv-swarm swarm init --from-pr-data
Label-Based Agent Assignment
Map PR labels to specialized agents:
{
"label-mapping": {
"bug": ["debugger", "tester"],
"feature": ["architect", "coder", "tester"],
"refactor": ["analyst", "coder"],
"docs": ["researcher", "writer"],
"performance": ["analyst", "optimizer"],
"security": ["security", "authentication", "audit"]
}
}
Topology Selection by PR Size
# Automatic topology selection based on PR complexity
# Small PR (< 100 lines): ring topology
# Medium PR (100-500 lines): mesh topology
# Large PR (> 500 lines): hierarchical topology
npx ruv-swarm github pr-topology --pr 123
π¬ PR Comment Commands
Execute swarm commands directly from PR comments:
<!-- In PR comment -->
/swarm init mesh 6
/swarm spawn coder "Implement authentication"
/swarm spawn tester "Write unit tests"
/swarm status
/swarm review --agents security,performance
<details>
<summary><strong>Webhook Handler for Comment Commands</strong></summary>
// webhook-handler.js
const { createServer } = require('http');
const { execSync } = require('child_process');
createServer((req, res) => {
if (req.url === '/github-webhook') {
const event = JSON.parse(body);
if (event.action === 'opened' && event.pull_request) {
execSync(`npx ruv-swarm github pr-init ${event.pull_request.number}`);
}
if (event.comment && event.comment.body.startsWith('/swarm')) {
const command = event.comment.body;
execSync(`npx ruv-swarm github handle-comment --pr ${event.issue.number} --command "${command}"`);
}
res.writeHead(200);
res.end('OK');
}
}).listen(3000);
</details>
βοΈ Review Configuration
Configuration File
# .github/review-swarm.yml
version: 1
review:
auto-trigger: true
required-agents:
- security
- performance
- style
optional-agents:
- architecture
- accessibility
- i18n
thresholds:
security: block # Block merge on security issues
performance: warn # Warn on performance issues
style: suggest # Suggest style improvements
rules:
security:
- no-eval
- no-hardcoded-secrets
- proper-auth-checks
- validate-input
performance:
- no-n-plus-one
- efficient-queries
- proper-caching
- optimize-loops
architecture:
- max-coupling: 5
- min-cohesion: 0.7
- follow-patterns
- avoid-circular-deps
Custom Review Triggers
{
"triggers": {
"high-risk-files": {
"paths": ["**/auth/**", "**/payment/**", "**/admin/**"],
"agents": ["security", "architecture"],
"depth": "comprehensive",
"require-approval": true
},
"performance-critical": {
"paths": ["**/api/**", "**/database/**", "**/cache/**"],
"agents": ["performance", "database"],
"benchmarks": true,
"regression-threshold": "5%"
},
"ui-changes": {
"paths": ["**/components/**", "**/styles/**", "**/pages/**"],
"agents": ["accessibility", "style", "i18n"],
"visual-tests": true,
"responsive-check": true
}
}
}
π€ Automated Workflows
Auto-Review on PR Creation
# .github/workflows/auto-review.yml
name: Automated Code Review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
issue_comment:
types: [created]
jobs:
swarm-review:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Setup GitHub CLI
run: echo "${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" | gh auth login --with-token
- name: Run Review Swarm
run: |
# Get PR context with gh CLI
PR_NUM=${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view $PR_NUM --json files,title,body,labels)
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff $PR_NUM)
# Run swarm review
REVIEW_OUTPUT=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-all \
--pr $PR_NUM \
--pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
--diff "$PR_DIFF" \
--agents "security,performance,style,architecture")
# Post review results
echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | gh pr review $PR_NUM --comment -F -
# Update PR status
if echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "approved"; then
gh pr review $PR_NUM --approve
elif echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "changes-requested"; then
gh pr review $PR_NUM --request-changes -b "See review comments above"
fi
- name: Update Labels
run: |
# Add labels based on review results
if echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "security"; then
gh pr edit $PR_NUM --add-label "security-review"
fi
if echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "performance"; then
gh pr edit $PR_NUM --add-label "performance-review"
fi
π¬ Intelligent Comment Generation
Generate Contextual Review Comments
# Get PR diff with context
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123 --color never)
PR_FILES=$(gh pr view 123 --json files)
# Generate review comments
COMMENTS=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-comment \
--pr 123 \
--diff "$PR_DIFF" \
--files "$PR_FILES" \
--style "constructive" \
--include-examples \
--suggest-fixes)
# Post comments using gh CLI
echo "$COMMENTS" | jq -c '.[]' | while read -r comment; do
FILE=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.path')
LINE=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.line')
BODY=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.body')
COMMIT_ID=$(gh pr view 123 --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)
# Create inline review comments
gh api \
--method POST \
/repos/:owner/:repo/pulls/123/comments \
-f path="$FILE" \
-f line="$LINE" \
-f body="$BODY" \
-f commit_id="$COMMIT_ID"
done
Batch Comment Management
# Manage review comments efficiently
npx ruv-swarm github review-comments \
--pr 123 \
--group-by "agent,severity" \
--summarize \
--resolve-outdated
πͺ Quality Gates & Checks
Status Checks
# Required status checks in branch protection
protection_rules:
required_status_checks:
strict: true
contexts:
- "review-swarm/security"
- "review-swarm/performance"
- "review-swarm/architecture"
- "review-swarm/tests"
Define Quality Gates
# Set quality gate thresholds
npx ruv-swarm github quality-gates \
--define '{
"security": {"threshold": "no-critical"},
"performance": {"regression": "<5%"},
"coverage": {"minimum": "80%"},
"architecture": {"complexity": "<10"},
"duplication": {"maximum": "5%"}
}'
Track Review Metrics
# Monitor review effectiveness
npx ruv-swarm github review-metrics \
--period 30d \
--metrics "issues-found,false-positives,fix-rate,time-to-review" \
--export-dashboard \
--format json
π Advanced Features
Context-Aware Reviews
Analyze PRs with full project context:
# Review with comprehensive context
npx ruv-swarm github review-context \
--pr 123 \
--load-related-prs \
--analyze-impact \
--check-breaking-changes \
--dependency-analysis
Learning from History
Train review agents on your codebase patterns:
# Learn from past reviews
npx ruv-swarm github review-learn \
--analyze-past-reviews \
--identify-patterns \
--improve-suggestions \
--reduce-false-positives
# Train on your codebase
npx ruv-swarm github review-train \
--learn-patterns \
--adapt-to-style \
--improve-accuracy
Cross-PR Analysis
Coordinate reviews across related pull requests:
# Analyze related PRs together
npx ruv-swarm github review-batch \
--prs "123,124,125" \
--check-consistency \
--verify-integration \
--combined-impact
Multi-PR Swarm Coordination
# Coordinate swarms across related PRs
npx ruv-swarm github multi-pr \
--prs "123,124,125" \
--strategy "parallel" \
--share-memory
π οΈ Custom Review Agents
Create Custom Agent
// custom-review-agent.js
class CustomReviewAgent {
constructor(config) {
this.config = config;
this.rules = config.rules || [];
}
async review(pr) {
const issues = [];
// Custom logic: Check for TODO comments in production code
if (await this.checkTodoComments(pr)) {
issues.push({
severity: 'warning',
file: pr.file,
line: pr.line,
message: 'TODO comment found in production code',
suggestion: 'Resolve TODO or create issue to track it'
});
}
// Custom logic: Verify API versioning
if (await this.checkApiVersioning(pr)) {
issues.push({
severity: 'error',
file: pr.file,
line: pr.line,
message: 'API endpoint missing versioning',
suggestion: 'Add /v1/, /v2/ prefix to API routes'
});
}
return issues;
}
async checkTodoComments(pr) {
// Implementation
const todoRegex = /\/\/\s*TODO|\/\*\s*TODO/gi;
return todoRegex.test(pr.diff);
}
async checkApiVersioning(pr) {
// Implementation
const apiRegex = /app\.(get|post|put|delete)\(['"]\/api\/(?!v\d+)/;
return apiRegex.test(pr.diff);
}
}
module.exports = CustomReviewAgent;
Register Custom Agent
# Register custom review agent
npx ruv-swarm github register-agent \
--name "custom-reviewer" \
--file "./custom-review-agent.js" \
--category "standards"
π§ CI/CD Integration
Integration with Build Pipeline
# .github/workflows/build-and-review.yml
name: Build and Review
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
build-and-test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: npm install
- run: npm test
- run: npm run build
swarm-review:
needs: build-and-test
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Run Swarm Review
run: |
npx ruv-swarm github review-all \
--pr ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} \
--include-build-results
Automated PR Fixes
# Auto-fix common issues
npx ruv-swarm github pr-fix 123 \
--issues "lint,test-failures,formatting" \
--commit-fixes \
--push-changes
Progress Updates to PR
# Post swarm progress to PR using gh CLI
PROGRESS=$(npx ruv-swarm github pr-progress 123 --format markdown)
gh pr comment 123 --body "$PROGRESS"
# Update PR labels based on progress
if [[ $(echo "$PROGRESS" | grep -o '[0-9]\+%' | sed 's/%//') -gt 90 ]]; then
gh pr edit 123 --add-label "ready-for-review"
fi
π Complete Workflow Examples
Example 1: Security-Critical PR
# Review authentication system changes
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 456 \
--agents "security,authentication,audit" \
--depth "maximum" \
--require-security-approval \
--penetration-test
Example 2: Performance-Sensitive PR
# Review database optimization
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 789 \
--agents "performance,database,caching" \
--benchmark \
--profile \
--load-test
Example 3: UI Component PR
# Review new component library
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 321 \
--agents "accessibility,style,i18n,docs" \
--visual-regression \
--component-tests \
--responsive-check
Example 4: Feature Development PR
# Review new feature implementation
gh pr view 456 --json body,labels,files | \
npx ruv-swarm github pr-init 456 \
--topology hierarchical \
--agents "architect,coder,tester,security" \
--auto-assign-tasks
Example 5: Bug Fix PR
# Review bug fix with debugging focus
npx ruv-swarm github pr-init 789 \
--topology mesh \
--agents "debugger,analyst,tester" \
--priority high \
--regression-test
π Monitoring & Analytics
Review Dashboard
# Launch real-time review dashboard
npx ruv-swarm github review-dashboard \
--real-time \
--show "agent-activity,issue-trends,fix-rates,coverage"
Generate Review Reports
# Create comprehensive review report
npx ruv-swarm github review-report \
--format "markdown" \
--include "summary,details,trends,recommendations" \
--email-stakeholders \
--export-pdf
PR Swarm Analytics
# Generate PR-specific analytics
npx ruv-swarm github pr-report 123 \
--metrics "completion-time,agent-efficiency,token-usage,issue-density" \
--format markdown \
--compare-baseline
Export to GitHub Insights
# Export metrics to GitHub Insights
npx ruv-swarm github export-metrics \
--pr 123 \
--to-insights \
--dashboard-url
π Security Considerations
Best Practices
- Token Permissions: Ensure GitHub tokens have minimal required scopes
- Command Validation: Validate all PR comments before execution
- Rate Limiting: Implement rate limits for PR operations
- Audit Trail: Log all swarm operations for compliance
- Secret Management: Never expose API keys in PR comments or logs
Security Checklist
- GitHub token scoped to repository only
- Webhook signatures verified
- Command injection protection enabled
- Rate limiting configured
- Audit logging enabled
- Secrets scanning active
- Branch protection rules enforced
π Best Practices
1. Review Configuration
- β Define clear review criteria upfront
- β Set appropriate severity thresholds
- β Configure agent specializations for your stack
- β Establish override procedures for emergencies
2. Comment Quality
- β Provide actionable, specific feedback
- β Include code examples with suggestions
- β Reference documentation and best practices
- β Maintain respectful, constructive tone
3. Performance Optimization
- β Cache analysis results to avoid redundant work
- β Use incremental reviews for large PRs
- β Enable parallel agent execution
- β Batch comment operations efficiently
4. PR Templates
<!-- .github/pull_request_template.md -->
## Swarm Configuration
- Topology: [mesh/hierarchical/ring/star]
- Max Agents: [number]
- Auto-spawn: [yes/no]
- Priority: [high/medium/low]
## Tasks for Swarm
- [ ] Task 1 description
- [ ] Task 2 description
- [ ] Task 3 description
## Review Focus Areas
- [ ] Security review
- [ ] Performance analysis
- [ ] Architecture validation
- [ ] Accessibility check
5. Auto-Merge When Ready
# Auto-merge when swarm completes and passes checks
SWARM_STATUS=$(npx ruv-swarm github pr-status 123)
if [[ "$SWARM_STATUS" == "complete" ]]; then
# Check review requirements
REVIEWS=$(gh pr view 123 --json reviews --jq '.reviews | length')
if [[ $REVIEWS -ge 2 ]]; then
# Enable auto-merge
gh pr merge 123 --auto --squash
fi
fi
π Integration with Claude Code
Workflow Pattern
- Claude Code reads PR diff and context
- Swarm coordinates review approach based on PR type
- Agents work in parallel on different review aspects
- Progress updates posted to PR automatically
- Final review performed before marking ready
Example: Complete PR Management
[Single Message - Parallel Execution]:
// Initialize coordination
mcp__claude-flow__swarm_init { topology: "hierarchical", maxAgents: 5 }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "reviewer", name: "Senior Reviewer" }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "tester", name: "QA Engineer" }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "coordinator", name: "Merge Coordinator" }
// Create and manage PR using gh CLI
Bash("gh pr create --title 'Feature: Add authentication' --base main")
Bash("gh pr view 54 --json files,diff")
Bash("gh pr review 54 --approve --body 'LGTM after automated review'")
// Execute tests and validation
Bash("npm test")
Bash("npm run lint")
Bash("npm run build")
// Track progress
TodoWrite { todos: [
{ content: "Complete code review", status: "completed", activeForm: "Completing code review" },
{ content: "Run test suite", status: "completed", activeForm: "Running test suite" },
{ content: "Validate security", status: "completed", activeForm: "Validating security" },
{ content: "Merge when ready", status: "pending", activeForm: "Merging when ready" }
]}
π Troubleshooting
Common Issues
<details> <summary><strong>Issue: Review agents not spawning</strong></summary>Solution:
# Check swarm status
npx ruv-swarm swarm-status
# Verify GitHub CLI authentication
gh auth status
# Re-initialize swarm
npx ruv-swarm github review-init --pr 123 --force
</details>
<details>
<summary><strong>Issue: Comments not posting to PR</strong></summary>
Solution:
# Verify GitHub token permissions
gh auth status
# Check API rate limits
gh api rate_limit
# Use batch comment posting
npx ruv-swarm github review-comments --pr 123 --batch
</details>
<details>
<summary><strong>Issue: Review taking too long</strong></summary>
Solution:
# Use incremental review for large PRs
npx ruv-swarm github review-init --pr 123 --incremental
# Reduce agent count
npx ruv-swarm github review-init --pr 123 --agents "security,style" --max-agents 3
# Enable parallel processing
npx ruv-swarm github review-init --pr 123 --parallel --cache-results
</details>
π Additional Resources
Related Skills
github-pr-manager- Comprehensive PR lifecycle managementgithub-workflow-automation- Automate GitHub workflowsswarm-coordination- Advanced swarm orchestration
Documentation
Support
- GitHub Issues: Report bugs and request features
- Community: Join discussions and share experiences
- Examples: Browse example configurations and workflows
π License
This skill is part of the Claude Code Flow project and is licensed under the MIT License.
Last Updated: 2025-10-19 Version: 1.0.0 Maintainer: Claude Code Flow Team
Quick Install
/plugin add https://github.com/DNYoussef/ai-chrome-extension/tree/main/github-code-reviewCopy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill
GitHub δ»εΊ
Related Skills
sglang
MetaSGLang is a high-performance LLM serving framework that specializes in fast, structured generation for JSON, regex, and agentic workflows using its RadixAttention prefix caching. It delivers significantly faster inference, especially for tasks with repeated prefixes, making it ideal for complex, structured outputs and multi-turn conversations. Choose SGLang over alternatives like vLLM when you need constrained decoding or are building applications with extensive prefix sharing.
business-rule-documentation
MetaThis skill provides standardized templates for systematically documenting business logic and domain knowledge following Domain-Driven Design principles. It helps developers capture business rules, process flows, decision trees, and terminology glossaries to maintain consistency between requirements and implementation. Use it when documenting domain models, creating business rule repositories, or bridging communication between business and technical teams.
generating-unit-tests
MetaThis skill automatically generates comprehensive unit tests from source code when developers request test creation. It supports multiple testing frameworks like Jest, pytest, and JUnit, intelligently detecting the appropriate one or using a specified framework. Use it when asking to "generate tests," "create unit tests," or using the "gut" shortcut with file paths.
Algorithmic Art Generation
MetaThis skill helps developers create algorithmic art using p5.js, focusing on generative art, computational aesthetics, and interactive visualizations. It automatically activates for topics like "generative art" or "p5.js visualization" and guides you through creating unique algorithms with features like seeded randomness, flow fields, and particle systems. Use it when you need to build reproducible, code-driven artistic patterns.
