정보
와이체프루프 스킬은 AES 및 RSA와 같은 알고리즘에서 알려진 공격 및 엣지 케이스에 대해 Project Wycheproof의 테스트 벡터를 사용하여 암호화 구현을 검증합니다. 이 스킬은 테스트 벡터 로드, 결과 플래그를 통과/실패 기대값에 매핑, 그리고 실패 해석을 처리합니다. 암호화 라이브러리를 표준 벡터에 대해 테스트하거나 구현 간 차이를 진단할 때 사용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add trailofbits/skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/trailofbits/skillsgit clone https://github.com/trailofbits/skills.git ~/.claude/skills/wycheproofClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Wycheproof
Wycheproof is an extensive collection of test vectors designed to verify the correctness of cryptographic implementations and test against known attacks. Originally developed by Google, it is now a community-managed project where contributors can add test vectors for specific cryptographic constructions.
Background
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Test vector | Input/output pair for validating crypto implementation correctness |
| Test group | Collection of test vectors sharing attributes (key size, IV size, curve) |
| Result flag | Indicates if test should pass (valid), fail (invalid), or is acceptable |
| Edge case testing | Testing for known vulnerabilities and attack patterns |
Why This Matters
Cryptographic implementations are notoriously difficult to get right. Even small bugs can:
- Expose private keys
- Allow signature forgery
- Enable message decryption
- Create consensus problems when different implementations accept/reject the same inputs
Wycheproof has found vulnerabilities in major libraries including OpenJDK's SHA1withDSA, Bouncy Castle's ECDHC, and the elliptic npm package.
When to Use
Apply Wycheproof when:
- Testing cryptographic implementations (AES-GCM, ECDSA, ECDH, RSA, etc.)
- Validating that crypto code handles edge cases correctly
- Verifying implementations against known attack vectors
- Setting up CI/CD for cryptographic libraries
- Auditing third-party crypto code for correctness
Consider alternatives when:
- Testing for timing side-channels (use constant-time testing tools instead)
- Finding new unknown bugs (use fuzzing instead)
- Testing custom/experimental cryptographic algorithms (Wycheproof only covers established algorithms)
Quick Reference
| Scenario | Recommended Approach | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AES-GCM implementation | Use aes_gcm_test.json | 316 test vectors across 44 test groups |
| ECDSA verification | Use ecdsa_*_test.json for specific curves | Tests signature malleability, DER encoding |
| ECDH key exchange | Use ecdh_*_test.json | Tests invalid curve attacks |
| RSA signatures | Use rsa_*_test.json | Tests padding oracle attacks |
| ChaCha20-Poly1305 | Use chacha20_poly1305_test.json | Tests AEAD implementation |
Testing Workflow
Phase 1: Setup Phase 2: Parse Test Vectors
┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ Add Wycheproof │ → │ Load JSON file │
│ as submodule │ │ Filter by params│
└─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
↓ ↓
Phase 4: CI Integration Phase 3: Write Harness
┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ Auto-update │ ← │ Test valid & │
│ test vectors │ │ invalid cases │
└─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
Repository Structure
The Wycheproof repository is organized as follows:
┣ 📜 README.md : Project overview
┣ 📂 doc : Documentation
┣ 📂 java : Java JCE interface testing harness
┣ 📂 javascript : JavaScript testing harness
┣ 📂 schemas : Test vector schemas
┣ 📂 testvectors : Test vectors
┗ 📂 testvectors_v1 : Updated test vectors (more detailed)
The essential folders are testvectors and testvectors_v1. While both contain similar files, testvectors_v1 includes more detailed information and is recommended for new integrations.
Supported Algorithms
Wycheproof provides test vectors for a wide range of cryptographic algorithms:
| Category | Algorithms |
|---|---|
| Symmetric Encryption | AES-GCM, AES-EAX, ChaCha20-Poly1305 |
| Signatures | ECDSA, EdDSA, RSA-PSS, RSA-PKCS1 |
| Key Exchange | ECDH, X25519, X448 |
| Hashing | HMAC, HKDF |
| Curves | secp256k1, secp256r1, secp384r1, secp521r1, ed25519, ed448 |
Test File Structure
Each JSON test file tests a specific cryptographic construction. All test files share common attributes:
"algorithm" : The name of the algorithm tested
"schema" : The JSON schema (found in schemas folder)
"generatorVersion" : The version number
"numberOfTests" : The total number of test vectors in this file
"header" : Detailed description of test vectors
"notes" : In-depth explanation of flags in test vectors
"testGroups" : Array of one or multiple test groups
Test Groups
Test groups group sets of tests based on shared attributes such as:
- Key sizes
- IV sizes
- Public keys
- Curves
This classification allows extracting tests that meet specific criteria relevant to the construction being tested.
Test Vector Attributes
Shared Attributes
All test vectors contain four common fields:
- tcId: Unique identifier for the test vector within a file
- comment: Additional information about the test case
- flags: Descriptions of specific test case types and potential dangers (referenced in
notesfield) - result: Expected outcome of the test
The result field can take three values:
| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
| valid | Test case should succeed |
| acceptable | Test case is allowed to succeed but contains non-ideal attributes |
| invalid | Test case should fail |
Unique Attributes
Unique attributes are specific to the algorithm being tested:
| Algorithm | Unique Attributes |
|---|---|
| AES-GCM | key, iv, aad, msg, ct, tag |
| ECDH secp256k1 | public, private, shared |
| ECDSA | msg, sig, result |
| EdDSA | msg, sig, pk |
Implementation Guide
Phase 1: Add Wycheproof to Your Project
Option 1: Git Submodule (Recommended)
Adding Wycheproof as a git submodule ensures automatic updates:
git submodule add https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof.git
Option 2: Fetch Specific Test Vectors
If submodules aren't possible, fetch specific JSON files:
#!/bin/bash
TMP_WYCHEPROOF_FOLDER=".wycheproof/"
TEST_VECTORS=('aes_gcm_test.json' 'aes_eax_test.json')
BASE_URL="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/C2SP/wycheproof/master/testvectors_v1/"
# Create wycheproof folder
mkdir -p $TMP_WYCHEPROOF_FOLDER
# Request all test vector files if they don't exist
for i in "${TEST_VECTORS[@]}"; do
if [ ! -f "${TMP_WYCHEPROOF_FOLDER}${i}" ]; then
curl -o "${TMP_WYCHEPROOF_FOLDER}${i}" "${BASE_URL}${i}"
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "Failed to download ${i}"
exit 1
fi
fi
done
Phase 2: Parse Test Vectors
Identify the test file for your algorithm and parse the JSON:
Python Example:
import json
def load_wycheproof_test_vectors(path: str):
testVectors = []
try:
with open(path, "r") as f:
wycheproof_json = json.loads(f.read())
except FileNotFoundError:
print(f"No Wycheproof file found at: {path}")
return testVectors
# Attributes that need hex-to-bytes conversion
convert_attr = {"key", "aad", "iv", "msg", "ct", "tag"}
for testGroup in wycheproof_json["testGroups"]:
# Filter test groups based on implementation constraints
if testGroup["ivSize"] < 64 or testGroup["ivSize"] > 1024:
continue
for tv in testGroup["tests"]:
# Convert hex strings to bytes
for attr in convert_attr:
if attr in tv:
tv[attr] = bytes.fromhex(tv[attr])
testVectors.append(tv)
return testVectors
JavaScript Example:
const fs = require('fs').promises;
async function loadWycheproofTestVectors(path) {
const tests = [];
try {
const fileContent = await fs.readFile(path);
const data = JSON.parse(fileContent.toString());
data.testGroups.forEach(testGroup => {
testGroup.tests.forEach(test => {
// Add shared test group properties to each test
test['pk'] = testGroup.publicKey.pk;
tests.push(test);
});
});
} catch (err) {
console.error('Error reading or parsing file:', err);
throw err;
}
return tests;
}
Phase 3: Write Testing Harness
Create test functions that handle both valid and invalid test cases.
Python/pytest Example:
import pytest
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.aead import AESGCM
tvs = load_wycheproof_test_vectors("wycheproof/testvectors_v1/aes_gcm_test.json")
@pytest.mark.parametrize("tv", tvs, ids=[str(tv['tcId']) for tv in tvs])
def test_encryption(tv):
try:
aesgcm = AESGCM(tv['key'])
ct = aesgcm.encrypt(tv['iv'], tv['msg'], tv['aad'])
except ValueError as e:
# Implementation raised error - verify test was expected to fail
assert tv['result'] != 'valid', tv['comment']
return
if tv['result'] == 'valid':
assert ct[:-16] == tv['ct'], f"Ciphertext mismatch: {tv['comment']}"
assert ct[-16:] == tv['tag'], f"Tag mismatch: {tv['comment']}"
elif tv['result'] == 'invalid' or tv['result'] == 'acceptable':
assert ct[:-16] != tv['ct'] or ct[-16:] != tv['tag']
@pytest.mark.parametrize("tv", tvs, ids=[str(tv['tcId']) for tv in tvs])
def test_decryption(tv):
try:
aesgcm = AESGCM(tv['key'])
decrypted_msg = aesgcm.decrypt(tv['iv'], tv['ct'] + tv['tag'], tv['aad'])
except ValueError:
assert tv['result'] != 'valid', tv['comment']
return
except InvalidTag:
assert tv['result'] != 'valid', tv['comment']
assert 'ModifiedTag' in tv['flags'], f"Expected 'ModifiedTag' flag: {tv['comment']}"
return
assert tv['result'] == 'valid', f"No invalid test case should pass: {tv['comment']}"
assert decrypted_msg == tv['msg'], f"Decryption mismatch: {tv['comment']}"
JavaScript/Mocha Example:
const assert = require('assert');
function testFactory(tcId, tests) {
it(`[${tcId + 1}] ${tests[tcId].comment}`, function () {
const test = tests[tcId];
const ed25519 = new eddsa('ed25519');
const key = ed25519.keyFromPublic(toArray(test.pk, 'hex'));
let sig;
if (test.result === 'valid') {
sig = key.verify(test.msg, test.sig);
assert.equal(sig, true, `[${test.tcId}] ${test.comment}`);
} else if (test.result === 'invalid') {
try {
sig = key.verify(test.msg, test.sig);
} catch (err) {
// Point could not be decoded
sig = false;
}
assert.equal(sig, false, `[${test.tcId}] ${test.comment}`);
}
});
}
// Generate tests for all test vectors
for (var tcId = 0; tcId < tests.length; tcId++) {
testFactory(tcId, tests);
}
Phase 4: CI Integration
Ensure test vectors stay up to date by:
- Using git submodules: Update submodule in CI before running tests
- Fetching latest vectors: Run fetch script before test execution
- Scheduled updates: Set up weekly/monthly updates to catch new test vectors
Common Vulnerabilities Detected
Wycheproof test vectors are designed to catch specific vulnerability patterns:
| Vulnerability | Description | Affected Algorithms | Example CVE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signature malleability | Multiple valid signatures for same message | ECDSA, EdDSA | CVE-2024-42459 |
| Invalid DER encoding | Accepting non-canonical DER signatures | ECDSA | CVE-2024-42460, CVE-2024-42461 |
| Invalid curve attacks | ECDH with invalid curve points | ECDH | Common in many libraries |
| Padding oracle | Timing leaks in padding validation | RSA-PKCS1 | Historical OpenSSL issues |
| Tag forgery | Accepting modified authentication tags | AES-GCM, ChaCha20-Poly1305 | Various implementations |
Signature Malleability: Deep Dive
Problem: Implementations that don't validate signature encoding can accept multiple valid signatures for the same message.
Example (EdDSA): Appending or removing zeros from signature:
Valid signature: ...6a5c51eb6f946b30d
Invalid signature: ...6a5c51eb6f946b30d0000 (should be rejected)
How to detect:
# Add signature length check
if len(sig) != 128: # EdDSA signatures must be exactly 64 bytes (128 hex chars)
return False
Impact: Can lead to consensus problems when different implementations accept/reject the same signatures.
Related Wycheproof tests:
- EdDSA: tcId 37 - "removing 0 byte from signature"
- ECDSA: tcId 06 - "Legacy: ASN encoding of r misses leading 0"
Case Study: Elliptic npm Package
This case study demonstrates how Wycheproof found three CVEs in the popular elliptic npm package (3000+ dependents, millions of weekly downloads).
Overview
The elliptic library is an elliptic-curve cryptography library written in JavaScript, supporting ECDH, ECDSA, and EdDSA. Using Wycheproof test vectors on version 6.5.6 revealed multiple vulnerabilities:
- CVE-2024-42459: EdDSA signature malleability (appending/removing zeros)
- CVE-2024-42460: ECDSA DER encoding - invalid bit placement
- CVE-2024-42461: ECDSA DER encoding - leading zero in length field
Methodology
- Identify supported curves: ed25519 for EdDSA
- Find test vectors:
testvectors_v1/ed25519_test.json - Parse test vectors: Load JSON and extract tests
- Write test harness: Create parameterized tests
- Run tests: Identify failures
- Analyze root causes: Examine implementation code
- Propose fixes: Add validation checks
Key Findings
EdDSA Issue (CVE-2024-42459):
- Missing signature length validation
- Allowed trailing zeros in signatures
- Fix: Add
if(sig.length !== 128) return false;
ECDSA Issue 1 (CVE-2024-42460):
- Missing check for first bit being zero in DER-encoded r and s values
- Fix: Add
if ((data[p.place] & 128) !== 0) return false;
ECDSA Issue 2 (CVE-2024-42461):
- DER length field accepted leading zeros
- Fix: Add
if(buf[p.place] === 0x00) return false;
Impact
All three vulnerabilities allowed multiple valid signatures for a single message, leading to consensus problems across implementations.
Lessons learned:
- Wycheproof catches subtle encoding bugs
- Reusable test harnesses pay dividends
- Test vector comments and flags help diagnose issues
- Even popular libraries benefit from systematic test vector validation
Advanced Usage
Tips and Tricks
| Tip | Why It Helps |
|---|---|
| Filter test groups by parameters | Focus on test vectors relevant to your implementation constraints |
| Use test vector flags | Understand specific vulnerability patterns being tested |
Check the notes field | Get detailed explanations of flag meanings |
| Test both encrypt/decrypt and sign/verify | Ensure bidirectional correctness |
| Run tests in CI | Catch regressions and benefit from new test vectors |
| Use parameterized tests | Get clear failure messages with tcId and comment |
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It's Wrong | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Only testing valid cases | Misses vulnerabilities where invalid inputs are accepted | Test all result types: valid, invalid, acceptable |
| Ignoring "acceptable" result | Implementation might have subtle bugs | Treat acceptable as warnings worth investigating |
| Not filtering test groups | Wastes time on unsupported parameters | Filter by keySize, ivSize, etc. based on your implementation |
| Not updating test vectors | Miss new vulnerability patterns | Use submodules or scheduled fetches |
| Testing only one direction | Encrypt/sign might work but decrypt/verify fails | Test both operations |
Related Skills
Tool Skills
| Skill | Primary Use in Wycheproof Testing |
|---|---|
| pytest | Python testing framework for parameterized tests |
| mocha | JavaScript testing framework for test generation |
| constant-time-testing | Complement Wycheproof with timing side-channel testing |
| cryptofuzz | Fuzz-based crypto testing to find additional bugs |
Technique Skills
| Skill | When to Apply |
|---|---|
| coverage-analysis | Ensure test vectors cover all code paths in crypto implementation |
| property-based-testing | Test mathematical properties (e.g., encrypt/decrypt round-trip) |
| fuzz-harness-writing | Create harnesses for crypto parsers (complements Wycheproof) |
Related Domain Skills
| Skill | Relationship |
|---|---|
| crypto-testing | Wycheproof is a key tool in comprehensive crypto testing methodology |
| fuzzing | Use fuzzing to find bugs Wycheproof doesn't cover (new edge cases) |
Skill Dependency Map
┌─────────────────────┐
│ wycheproof │
│ (this skill) │
└──────────┬──────────┘
│
┌───────────────────┼───────────────────┐
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ pytest/mocha │ │ constant-time │ │ cryptofuzz │
│ (test framework)│ │ testing │ │ (fuzzing) │
└────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘ └────────┬────────┘
│ │ │
└───────────────────┼───────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│ Technique Skills │
│ coverage, harness, PBT │
└──────────────────────────┘
Resources
Official Repository
The official repository contains:
- All test vectors in
testvectors/andtestvectors_v1/ - JSON schemas in
schemas/ - Reference implementations in Java and JavaScript
- Documentation in
doc/
Real-World Examples
The pycryptodome library integrates Wycheproof test vectors in their test suite, demonstrating best practices for Python crypto implementations.
Community Resources
- C2SP Community - Cryptographic specifications and standards community maintaining Wycheproof
- Wycheproof issues tracker - Report bugs in test vectors or suggest new constructions
Summary
Wycheproof is an essential tool for validating cryptographic implementations against known attack vectors and edge cases. By integrating Wycheproof test vectors into your testing workflow:
- Catch subtle encoding and validation bugs
- Prevent signature malleability issues
- Ensure consistent behavior across implementations
- Benefit from community-contributed test vectors
- Protect against known cryptographic vulnerabilities
The investment in writing a reusable testing harness pays dividends through continuous validation as new test vectors are added to the Wycheproof repository.
GitHub 저장소
자주 묻는 질문
wycheproof Skill이란 무엇인가요?
wycheproof은(는) trailofbits이(가) 만든 Claude Skill입니다. Skill은 Claude가 필요할 때 불러오는 지침과 리소스를 묶어 추가 프롬프트 없이 wycheproof 관련 작업을 수행할 수 있게 합니다.
wycheproof은(는) 어떻게 설치하나요?
이 페이지의 설치 명령을 사용하세요. wycheproof을(를) Claude Code 플러그인으로 추가하거나 저장소를 skills 디렉터리에 복제한 다음 Claude를 다시 시작해 Skill을 불러옵니다.
wycheproof은(는) 어떤 카테고리에 속하나요?
wycheproof은(는) 테스팅 카테고리에 속합니다.
wycheproof은(는) 무료로 사용할 수 있나요?
네. wycheproof은(는) AIMCP에 등록되어 있으며 무료로 설치할 수 있습니다.
연관 스킬
이 Claude Skill은 MMLU, GSM8K를 포함한 60개 이상의 표준화된 학술 과제에서 LLM 성능을 벤치마크하기 위해 lm-evaluation-harness를 실행합니다. 개발자들이 모델 품질을 비교하고, 학습 진행 상황을 추적하거나 학술 결과를 보고할 수 있도록 설계되었습니다. 이 도구는 HuggingFace와 vLLM 모델을 포함한 다양한 백엔드를 지원합니다.
이 스킬은 cron 표현식을 사용하여 Worker를 스케줄링하기 위한 Cloudflare Cron Triggers 구현에 관한 포괄적인 지식을 제공합니다. 주기적 작업, 유지보수 작업, 자동화된 워크플로우 설정 방법을 다루며, 잘못된 cron 표현식이나 시간대 문제 같은 일반적인 이슈들을 해결하는 방법을 포함합니다. 개발자들은 이를 통해 스케줄된 핸들러 구성, cron 트리거 테스트, Workflows 및 Green Compute와의 연동 작업을 수행할 수 있습니다.
이 Claude Skill은 Python 스크립트를 통해 로컬 웹 애플리케이션을 테스트하기 위한 Playwright 기반 툴킷을 제공합니다. 프론트엔드 검증, UI 디버깅, 스크린샷 캡처, 로그 확인 기능을 지원하며 서버 라이프사이클을 관리합니다. 브라우저 자동화 작업에 사용하되 컨텍스트 오염을 방지하기 위해 소스 코드를 읽지 않고 스크립트를 직접 실행하세요.
이 스킬은 테스트 통과를 확인한 후 체계적인 통합 옵션을 제시하여 개발자가 완성된 작업을 마무리하도록 돕습니다. 구현이 완료된 후 머지, PR 생성, 브랜치 정리와 같은 워크플로우를 안내합니다. 코드가 준비되고 테스트가 완료되었을 때 개발 프로세스를 체계적으로 마무리하기 위해 사용하세요.
