lsp-dead-code
关于
The lsp-dead-code skill identifies unused exports in a file by enumerating symbols and checking for zero references across the workspace. It helps developers audit for dead code, clean up APIs, and determine which exports are safe to remove. The skill requires the agent-lsp MCP server and uses LSP operations like list_symbols and find_references.
快速安装
Claude Code
推荐npx skills add blackwell-systems/agent-lsp -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/blackwell-systems/agent-lspgit clone https://github.com/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp.git ~/.claude/skills/lsp-dead-code在 Claude Code 中复制并粘贴此命令以安装该技能
技能文档
Requires the agent-lsp MCP server.
lsp-dead-code
Audit an exported symbol list for zero-reference candidates. Calls
list_symbols to enumerate symbols, then checks each exported
symbol with find_references to find callers. Produces a classified report.
When to Use
Use this skill when you want to identify dead code in a file — exported symbols that are defined but never called anywhere in the workspace. Common use cases:
- Cleaning up APIs before a release
- Identifying legacy exports that can be safely removed
- Auditing a package for unused public surface area
Important: This skill surfaces candidates. Always review results manually before deleting anything. See the Caveats section below.
What counts as "exported"
| Language | Exported means... |
|---|---|
| Go | Identifier starts with an uppercase letter (e.g. MyFunc, MyType) |
| TypeScript | Has export keyword; or is a public class member (no private) |
| Python | Not prefixed with _; or explicitly listed in __all__ |
| Java/C# | Has public or protected visibility modifier |
| Rust | Has pub keyword |
Prerequisites
If LSP is not yet initialized, call mcp__lsp__start_lsp with the
workspace root first:
mcp__lsp__start_lsp({ "root_dir": "/your/workspace" })
agent-lsp supports auto-inference from file paths, so explicit start is only required when switching workspaces or on a cold session.
Step 0 — Verify indexing is complete (mandatory)
Do not skip this step. An under-indexed workspace returns [] for
symbols that ARE referenced, producing false dead-code candidates.
Pick one symbol you know is actively used (e.g. the primary constructor,
a widely-called utility function). Call find_references on it:
mcp__lsp__find_references({
"file_path": "/abs/path/to/file.go",
"line": <known-active symbol line>,
"column": <known-active symbol column>,
"include_declaration": false
})
If this returns []: the workspace is not indexed. Wait 3–5 seconds
and retry. Do not proceed until a known-active symbol returns ≥1 reference.
If it never returns results after 15 seconds, restart the LSP server with
mcp__lsp__restart_lsp_server and re-open the target file.
Step 1 — Open the file and enumerate symbols
Open the file so the language server tracks it, then fetch all symbols:
mcp__lsp__open_document({ "file_path": "/abs/path/to/file.go" })
mcp__lsp__list_symbols({ "file_path": "/abs/path/to/file.go" })
Collect the full symbol list. Filter to exported symbols only using the language-appropriate rule from the table above.
Coordinate note: list_symbols returns 1-based coordinates.
Pass selectionRange.start.line and selectionRange.start.character
directly to find_references — no conversion needed.
"no identifier found" error: This means the column points to whitespace
or a keyword rather than the identifier name. This happens with methods
whose receiver prefix shifts the name rightward (e.g. func (c *Client) MethodName
— the name starts at column 21, not column 1). Fix: grep the declaration
line for the symbol name to find its exact column:
grep -n "MethodName" file.go
# count characters to find the 1-based column of the name
Then retry find_references with the corrected column.
Step 2 — Check references for each exported symbol
For each exported symbol, call find_references with
include_declaration: false so the definition site itself is excluded
from the count. A count of 0 means no callers, not no occurrences.
mcp__lsp__find_references({
"file_path": "/abs/path/to/file.go",
"line": <selectionRange.start.line>,
"column": <selectionRange.start.character>,
"include_declaration": false
})
Record the result for each symbol:
{ symbol_name, kind, line, reference_count, locations[] }
Batching note: For files with many exported symbols (>20), process in batches of 5–10 to avoid overwhelming the LSP server.
Zero-reference cross-check (required before classifying as dead):
When find_references returns [] for a symbol that looks foundational
(a handler, a constructor, a type used as a field), do not trust LSP alone.
LSP can miss references made through value-passing, interface satisfaction,
or function registration patterns (e.g. server.AddResource(HandleFoo)).
Before classifying as dead, run a text search in the primary wiring files:
grep -r "SymbolName" main.go server.go cmd/ internal/
If grep finds the name in a registration or assignment context, the symbol is active — LSP just couldn't resolve the indirect reference. Update your classification accordingly.
Step 3 — Classify and report
Classify each exported symbol by reference count:
- Zero references (LSP + grep) — confirmed dead candidate. Flag with WARNING.
- Zero LSP, found by grep — active via registration/value pattern. Mark as ACTIVE.
- 1–2 references — review manually. May be test-only usage.
- 3+ references — active symbol. Not dead code.
For test-only references: if all locations are in _test.go files (Go) or
files named *.test.* / *.spec.*, mark the symbol as "test-only" in
the report rather than "zero-reference".
Produce the Dead Code Report using the format in references/patterns.md.
Caveats
The following cases produce zero LSP references even though the symbol IS used at runtime. Do not delete any zero-reference candidate without manual review:
-
Incomplete indexing.
find_referencesonly searches files open or indexed by the language server. If the workspace is partially indexed, results may be incomplete. The Step 0 warm-up check catches this. -
Registration patterns. Symbols passed as values to registration functions (e.g.
server.AddTool(HandleFoo),http.HandleFunc("/", handler)) appear as zero LSP references from the definition site because gopls tracks the call to the registrar, not the handler name. Always grep wiring files for zero-reference handlers before classifying as dead. -
Reflection and dynamic dispatch. Symbols used via reflection (
reflect.TypeOfin Go,Class.forNamein Java) or dynamic dispatch have no static call sites visible to the LSP. -
//go:linknameand assembly. Go symbols linked via//go:linknameor referenced from assembly files will show zero LSP references. -
Library public API. Exported symbols called from external packages not present in the workspace will show zero references even if consumers exist.
-
Declaration excluded from count. The definition site is not counted (
include_declaration: false). A count of 0 means no callers found, not that the symbol never appears in the source tree. -
Always review before deleting. Zero LSP references is a signal to investigate, not a guarantee the symbol is unused.
Step 4 — Next steps
After generating the report:
-
For each zero-reference symbol (confirmed by grep): Run
lsp-impacton the symbol to confirm. Iflsp-impactalso finds zero references, it is safe to consider for removal. Still check the Caveats section above. -
For symbols with only test-file references: Mark as "test-only" in the report. These may be candidates for removal if the tests themselves are redundant, but should not be deleted without reviewing whether the tests serve a documentation or contract purpose.
-
For symbols with 1–2 references in production code: These are likely active but lightly used. Do not remove without checking whether they are part of a committed public API.
Step 5 — Optional cleanup with safe_delete_symbol
After reviewing the dead code report and confirming candidates with the user,
you may offer to remove confirmed zero-reference symbols using safe_delete_symbol:
mcp__lsp__safe_delete_symbol({
"file_path": "/abs/path/to/file.go",
"symbol_path": "DeadFunction"
})
This tool performs its own reference check before deleting. If any references exist (even ones missed in the initial scan), the deletion is refused.
Requirements before using this step:
- The user has explicitly confirmed they want the symbol removed.
- The symbol was classified as a confirmed dead candidate (zero LSP + zero grep references).
- You have reviewed the Caveats section above and communicated relevant risks.
Do NOT auto-delete symbols without user confirmation. Present the dead code
report first, let the user select which symbols to remove, then execute
safe_delete_symbol for each approved removal.
GitHub 仓库
相关推荐技能
qmd
开发这是一个本地搜索和索引的CLI工具,支持BM25、向量搜索和重排序功能。开发者可以用它快速索引本地文件(如Markdown文档)并进行混合搜索,特别适合代码库或文档的本地检索。它还提供MCP模式,能轻松集成到Claude开发环境中使用。
subagent-driven-development
开发该Skill用于在当前会话中执行包含独立任务的实施计划,它会为每个任务分派一个全新的子代理并在任务间进行代码审查。这种"全新子代理+任务间审查"的模式既能保障代码质量,又能实现快速迭代。适合需要在当前会话中连续执行独立任务,并希望在每个任务后都有质量把关的开发场景。
mcporter
开发mcporter Skill 让开发者能在Claude中直接管理和调用MCP服务器。它支持列出可用服务器、调用工具、处理OAuth认证以及管理服务器守护进程。开发者可以通过命令行式交互快速执行`mcporter list`查看服务器,或使用`mcporter call`直接调用工具,简化了MCP工作流程。
adk-deployment-specialist
开发这是一个用于部署和编排Google Vertex AI ADK智能体的Claude Skill,专为构建生产级多智能体系统而设计。它支持通过A2A协议进行智能体通信,提供代码执行沙箱和记忆库功能,并能处理智能体发现与任务提交。当开发者需要部署ADK智能体或编排多智能体协作时,可使用此Skill来简化Vertex AI Agent Engine的部署流程。
